![]() I'm sure that's why most went after them in the first place. While you may end up with a high stakes, huge boost diamond player hoodie, you will definitely find them in GvG. For as much as this may harm non payers in PvP I believe it will decimate them in GvG. I can see non payers becoming discouraged getting plundered by someone who paid for a huge boost. ![]() The issue with this is for PvP it makes it much harder to defend against. Up until the Cherry Garden set I am unaware of any imbalance when it came to attack bonus that a paying player was able to acquire over a free player. This tips the balance quite strongly towards the payer. Up until the Cherry Garden set the game kept paying players and free players at a pretty even keel fight wise. ![]() ![]() While there's nothing wrong with people doing that, they are doing exactly what the game allows, I wonder if it's such a good idea. The issue I see with this is obviously a player who pays more can get more attack bonuses. These new set buildings, Cherry Garden and now more so Elephant set a player can get multiples. With Speaker's Corner and Checkmate square each player could only acquire one. 4 which seems to be the average.I'm wondering what everyone's opinion is on the attack boost sets. It's like the foe-elite take on GBs, every new GB comes with a big mortgage which increases with every level, and takes years to pay for itself. Most gains are lost facing the increased power of higher levels. But the best way to gain attack boost is to stay put. ![]() I think moving up before the current level is maximised is mostly done out of boredom, or to give better contributions to the Guild. Each higher era is increasingly more difficult, and requires more resources to accomplish the same results as the previous era. Boost doesn't really mean much unless you consider your opposition. It will always be better than carousel.Ī great way to have a superior boost is to park□. In LMA the average boost seems to be about 6%\cell, so it will be better thru contemporary, probably Arctic considering the roads required for checkmate. I agree with you Baker, Cypress and Olive are very good, plus don't require a road system. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |